JACKSONVILLE, FL—U.S. Attorney Robert E. O’Neill
announces that the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit yesterday affirmed the convictions of former Jacksonville Port
Authority (JAXPort) Chairman Tony Devaughan Nelson on 36
corruption-related charges, including bribery, money laundering, honest
services mail fraud, and making a false statement to the FBI. The
evidence at trial established that, as chairman, Nelson had demanded and
accepted $143,500 in bribes from a dredging contractor at JAXPort.
Nelson is serving a 40-month prison sentence.
Nelson argued on appeal that his convictions should be vacated because the federal fraud and bribery statutes under which he was convicted are unconstitutionally vague, the district court improperly instructed the jury on the applicable law, and the court improperly admitted the testimony of JAXPort’s director of procurement. The ACLU Foundation of Florida Inc. and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers also filed a brief on Nelson’s behalf as amicus curiae.
After hearing oral argument, the Court of Appeals issued a split decision, with the majority holding that the challenged statutes “gave Nelson adequate notice of the conduct they prohibit,” that the district court’s instructions correctly “propelled [the jury] to look to Nelson’s state of mind” in taking payments in exchange for his influence, and that the challenged evidence was relevant and not unfairly prejudicial.
The appeal was handled by Assistant United States Attorneys David P. Rhodes and Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. The underlying case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mac D. Heavener, III and Mark B. Devereaux, and it was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Nelson argued on appeal that his convictions should be vacated because the federal fraud and bribery statutes under which he was convicted are unconstitutionally vague, the district court improperly instructed the jury on the applicable law, and the court improperly admitted the testimony of JAXPort’s director of procurement. The ACLU Foundation of Florida Inc. and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers also filed a brief on Nelson’s behalf as amicus curiae.
After hearing oral argument, the Court of Appeals issued a split decision, with the majority holding that the challenged statutes “gave Nelson adequate notice of the conduct they prohibit,” that the district court’s instructions correctly “propelled [the jury] to look to Nelson’s state of mind” in taking payments in exchange for his influence, and that the challenged evidence was relevant and not unfairly prejudicial.
The appeal was handled by Assistant United States Attorneys David P. Rhodes and Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. The underlying case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mac D. Heavener, III and Mark B. Devereaux, and it was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment